Need a couple of points clarified, please.
1. Does the beam measurement INCLUDE tumble home? Rick W. posted several years (8/31/12) back that is does NOT. The instructions with the Policy would indicate it does. We have some boats that are really, really close to the max when including the tumble home.
The current rule states measuring at the 'beam', a common nautical term meaning the widest part of the boat, and has been the rule since 2005. So yes, you should measure at the beam and if a boat does not conform, measure at the sheer, (I suggest less than 1/4 inch below the top deck surface) and advise the CS of the boat particulars. Prior to this the rule had specified measuring the sheer curve (starting Jan 1, 1978). A motion has been made to change the rule, and the class will vote this year. There will be discussion when the motion is published. TomP.
2. Is there any leeway in the keel thickness? If the fattest part of the keel is several thousandths over 2.1" should we get out the grinder and the gel coat?
The problem has been noted and occurs after the boat has been joined. It has been addressed by a motion to change the rule to specify that the 2.1 is after joining by the hull Mfg, and adding a maximum of 2.15 (54.61mm) after installation of lead. Again, the class will vote this year. My new boat came in too wide, when measured with our keel block, wider than 2.145. When measured at the specific MM conversion at 2.15, it was OK. Notify the CS if you find anything different
3. What is the norm when it comes to adding weight to the boat to compensate for the rig when tank testing? Is it placed on the step or does it get split and some on the step and some on the bow?
The weight is set on the mast step, 12.5 oz if the boat cannot be measured with the mast up,
Thanks Joe